<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Google Suppressing Wimbledon ads?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dixonjones.com/seo/are-google-suppressing-wimbledon-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dixonjones.com/seo/are-google-suppressing-wimbledon-ads/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mayhemuk</title>
		<link>http://dixonjones.com/seo/are-google-suppressing-wimbledon-ads/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>mayhemuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 16:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dixonjones.com/seo/are-google-suppressing-wimbledon-ads/#comment-194</guid>
		<description>Yes - possibly - but in the UK that would be a bit of a problem as Wimbledon has 30,000 homes and makes up a substantial area of London. Other towns contain Florist adverts, or localized results. Even so - if Google upholds a DMCA for Wimbledon, they probably should hold themselves to the same standard and not advertise their own widget content either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes - possibly - but in the UK that would be a bit of a problem as Wimbledon has 30,000 homes and makes up a substantial area of London. Other towns contain Florist adverts, or localized results. Even so - if Google upholds a DMCA for Wimbledon, they probably should hold themselves to the same standard and not advertise their own widget content either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenstar</title>
		<link>http://dixonjones.com/seo/are-google-suppressing-wimbledon-ads/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dixonjones.com/seo/are-google-suppressing-wimbledon-ads/#comment-193</guid>
		<description>Since the only other advertiser is an official ticket seller, couldn't it be that Wimbledon filed a trademark complaint with Google AdWords, hence there being only official ads?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the only other advertiser is an official ticket seller, couldn&#8217;t it be that Wimbledon filed a trademark complaint with Google AdWords, hence there being only official ads?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
