<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linkscape vs Majestic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dixonjones.com/seo/linkscape-vs-majestic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dixonjones.com/seo/linkscape-vs-majestic/</link>
	<description>Building Links between Internet Marketing and Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:23:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marty</title>
		<link>http://dixonjones.com/seo/linkscape-vs-majestic/comment-page-1/#comment-1704</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 23:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dixonjones.com/?p=486#comment-1704</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this decent comparison, I agree with your conslusion and most comments here: Once you get used to it, Majestic is one step ahead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this decent comparison, I agree with your conslusion and most comments here: Once you get used to it, Majestic is one step ahead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: melanotan</title>
		<link>http://dixonjones.com/seo/linkscape-vs-majestic/comment-page-1/#comment-1673</link>
		<dc:creator>melanotan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 08:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dixonjones.com/?p=486#comment-1673</guid>
		<description>I agree, I tend to trust majestic&#039;s data over linkscape. I&#039;ve experienced user problems with linkscape, not picking up backlinks that yahoo site explorer can easily do so...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, I tend to trust majestic&#8217;s data over linkscape. I&#8217;ve experienced user problems with linkscape, not picking up backlinks that yahoo site explorer can easily do so&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Tool</title>
		<link>http://dixonjones.com/seo/linkscape-vs-majestic/comment-page-1/#comment-1670</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Tool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 17:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dixonjones.com/?p=486#comment-1670</guid>
		<description>Right now I trust majestic&#039;s data more than linkscape (or open site explorer) because it seems to match up closer with the real numbers. 

Also linkscape seems to favor big websites, sometimes linkscape can&#039;t find any backlinks or very few backlinks for a domain where majestic seems to have an easier time.

Right now it&#039;s more about the tool that&#039;s going to provide me the most information. 

But linkscape is probably going to be the future of backlink analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right now I trust majestic&#8217;s data more than linkscape (or open site explorer) because it seems to match up closer with the real numbers. </p>
<p>Also linkscape seems to favor big websites, sometimes linkscape can&#8217;t find any backlinks or very few backlinks for a domain where majestic seems to have an easier time.</p>
<p>Right now it&#8217;s more about the tool that&#8217;s going to provide me the most information. </p>
<p>But linkscape is probably going to be the future of backlink analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beginner&#8217;s Guide to Link Metrics &#124; Search Engine Journal</title>
		<link>http://dixonjones.com/seo/linkscape-vs-majestic/comment-page-1/#comment-1609</link>
		<dc:creator>Beginner&#8217;s Guide to Link Metrics &#124; Search Engine Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dixonjones.com/?p=486#comment-1609</guid>
		<description>[...] a full comparison of Majestic SEO to SEOmoz&#8217;s Linkscape, check out this post from Dixon Jones which provides a pretty thorough [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a full comparison of Majestic SEO to SEOmoz&#8217;s Linkscape, check out this post from Dixon Jones which provides a pretty thorough [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://dixonjones.com/seo/linkscape-vs-majestic/comment-page-1/#comment-1474</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dixonjones.com/?p=486#comment-1474</guid>
		<description>Great Review thanks heaps. Was about to signup for SEOmoz but will try some credits on Majestic first now.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Review thanks heaps. Was about to signup for SEOmoz but will try some credits on Majestic first now.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dixon Jones</title>
		<link>http://dixonjones.com/seo/linkscape-vs-majestic/comment-page-1/#comment-1461</link>
		<dc:creator>Dixon Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dixonjones.com/?p=486#comment-1461</guid>
		<description>SEOBenz - were you at the same conference that we were all at? I thought Majestic got a pretty decent showing, and Linkscape/ SEOMoz even had a party! I know because I had fun beating Matt Cutts in a game of cards. I know that Majestic was mentioned positively in at least seven sessions. I was on two of them.

I just tried to take SEOENG for a quick test drive. But unfortunatey got: http://www.seoeng.com/engine-maintenance.htm - Looks to be focussed on tools and analysis rather than data though - so quite different. Did you know where SEOENG gets its link data? Yahoo/BOSS?

[Added]It is working again now and looks pretty neat. It&#039;s much more an SEO Toolset than a  link database - but there seems to be a lot of stuff there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEOBenz &#8211; were you at the same conference that we were all at? I thought Majestic got a pretty decent showing, and Linkscape/ SEOMoz even had a party! I know because I had fun beating Matt Cutts in a game of cards. I know that Majestic was mentioned positively in at least seven sessions. I was on two of them.</p>
<p>I just tried to take SEOENG for a quick test drive. But unfortunatey got: <a href="http://www.seoeng.com/engine-maintenance.htm">http://www.seoeng.com/engine-maintenance.htm</a> &#8211; Looks to be focussed on tools and analysis rather than data though &#8211; so quite different. Did you know where SEOENG gets its link data? Yahoo/BOSS?</p>
<p>[Added]It is working again now and looks pretty neat. It&#8217;s much more an SEO Toolset than a  link database &#8211; but there seems to be a lot of stuff there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seobenz</title>
		<link>http://dixonjones.com/seo/linkscape-vs-majestic/comment-page-1/#comment-1458</link>
		<dc:creator>seobenz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dixonjones.com/?p=486#comment-1458</guid>
		<description>Just got back from PubCon in Vegas.  Didn&#039;t see seomoz or majestic, but SEOENG was there.  Haven&#039;t spent much time using it, but everyone was talking about it in the sessions.  Of course most of the people were geeks, not the c-level people, but among the techies SEOENG was a hit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just got back from PubCon in Vegas.  Didn&#8217;t see seomoz or majestic, but SEOENG was there.  Haven&#8217;t spent much time using it, but everyone was talking about it in the sessions.  Of course most of the people were geeks, not the c-level people, but among the techies SEOENG was a hit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Dugdale</title>
		<link>http://dixonjones.com/seo/linkscape-vs-majestic/comment-page-1/#comment-1456</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Dugdale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 17:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dixonjones.com/?p=486#comment-1456</guid>
		<description>Great write up! I have played around with both and so far Majestic appears to be a better fit for me. But I would love to see the Majestic more user friendly. I am sure you and someone like Rae could give them a ton of recommendations to make the site more usable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great write up! I have played around with both and so far Majestic appears to be a better fit for me. But I would love to see the Majestic more user friendly. I am sure you and someone like Rae could give them a ton of recommendations to make the site more usable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Zeitgeist &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Link Building this Month (06.2009)</title>
		<link>http://dixonjones.com/seo/linkscape-vs-majestic/comment-page-1/#comment-1455</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Zeitgeist &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Link Building this Month (06.2009)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 05:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dixonjones.com/?p=486#comment-1455</guid>
		<description>[...] research is a very important part of a link marketing campaign. Tools like MajesticSEO or Linkscape can be very useful, but I&#8217;d recommend reading Garrett French&#8217;s link builder’s guide [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] research is a very important part of a link marketing campaign. Tools like MajesticSEO or Linkscape can be very useful, but I&#8217;d recommend reading Garrett French&#8217;s link builder’s guide [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grossesse</title>
		<link>http://dixonjones.com/seo/linkscape-vs-majestic/comment-page-1/#comment-1336</link>
		<dc:creator>grossesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dixonjones.com/?p=486#comment-1336</guid>
		<description>Linkscape is considerably more intuitive at the present time, but there is much more depth of data at Majestic and for professionals, the learning curve will be worth the effort. By contrast, though, SEOMoz [Linkscape] has a huge variety of other tools available within its membership fee which you will still need for Internet Marketing even if you do go for Majestic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linkscape is considerably more intuitive at the present time, but there is much more depth of data at Majestic and for professionals, the learning curve will be worth the effort. By contrast, though, SEOMoz [Linkscape] has a huge variety of other tools available within its membership fee which you will still need for Internet Marketing even if you do go for Majestic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
