<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Number 1 for &#8220;Search Engine Optimisation&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dixonjones.com/seo/number-1-for-search-engine-optimisation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dixonjones.com/seo/number-1-for-search-engine-optimisation/</link>
	<description>Building Links between Internet Marketing and Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 23:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee McCoy</title>
		<link>http://dixonjones.com/seo/number-1-for-search-engine-optimisation/comment-page-1/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee McCoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dixonjones.com/?p=142#comment-298</guid>
		<description>oh my!

I was doing some rubbish stuff then:

http://web.archive.org/web/20011201013059/www.5th-dimension.co.uk/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh my!</p>
<p>I was doing some rubbish stuff then:</p>
<p><a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20011201013059/www.5th-dimension.co.uk/">http://web.archive.org/web/20011201013059/www.5th-dimension.co.uk/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://dixonjones.com/seo/number-1-for-search-engine-optimisation/comment-page-1/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 04:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dixonjones.com/?p=142#comment-297</guid>
		<description>How lovely to look back into the time and search the 2001 results. Talk about nostalgia!
SEO was still simple then...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How lovely to look back into the time and search the 2001 results. Talk about nostalgia!<br />
SEO was still simple then&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dixon Jones</title>
		<link>http://dixonjones.com/seo/number-1-for-search-engine-optimisation/comment-page-1/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Dixon Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 11:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dixonjones.com/?p=142#comment-284</guid>
		<description>:)

We didn&#039;t have 9,000 sitewide links. But I take your point. I doubt DMOZ was the only cause.

Please bear in mind this was way back... I am not sure how old you are at this game, but it was the &quot;Florida Update&quot; when the domain took the hit - so a long time back. It was hit for the right reasons, but the interesting thing about the DMOZ listing is that it is the only domain I ever saw where (if you were ever a Dmoz editor) you could look at the domain listing history and saw a massive red warning over the history, saying that it was a doorway domain and should never be reincluded. 

It wasn&#039;t always thus... and here&#039;s where the strategy really went &quot;off the beaten track&quot;... we originally set up the domain to be owned by a limited company called &quot;Search Engine Optimisation LTD&quot;... Belt and braces! Unfortunately, Search engine optimizers LTD complained to Compaines House (That&#039;s the UK registry of English and Welsh companies) that the new company name might confuse people, so objected to the company name. We ended up called the holding company www.search-engine-optimisation.co.uk lTD... probably a bit of a clue eh? :)

Maybe I&#039;ll add this to my &quot;Internet Marketing Howlers&quot; talk at A4U next week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://dixonjones.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>We didn&#8217;t have 9,000 sitewide links. But I take your point. I doubt DMOZ was the only cause.</p>
<p>Please bear in mind this was way back&#8230; I am not sure how old you are at this game, but it was the &#8220;Florida Update&#8221; when the domain took the hit &#8211; so a long time back. It was hit for the right reasons, but the interesting thing about the DMOZ listing is that it is the only domain I ever saw where (if you were ever a Dmoz editor) you could look at the domain listing history and saw a massive red warning over the history, saying that it was a doorway domain and should never be reincluded. </p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t always thus&#8230; and here&#8217;s where the strategy really went &#8220;off the beaten track&#8221;&#8230; we originally set up the domain to be owned by a limited company called &#8220;Search Engine Optimisation LTD&#8221;&#8230; Belt and braces! Unfortunately, Search engine optimizers LTD complained to Compaines House (That&#8217;s the UK registry of English and Welsh companies) that the new company name might confuse people, so objected to the company name. We ended up called the holding company <a href="http://www.search-engine-optimisation.co.uk">www.search-engine-optimisation.co.uk</a> lTD&#8230; probably a bit of a clue eh? <img src='http://dixonjones.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;ll add this to my &#8220;Internet Marketing Howlers&#8221; talk at A4U next week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marius</title>
		<link>http://dixonjones.com/seo/number-1-for-search-engine-optimisation/comment-page-1/#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>Marius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dixonjones.com/?p=142#comment-283</guid>
		<description>So you really believe the DMOZ link made the difference?
Or is the same cause and effect issue like the guy with 9000 sitewide links? :)
Love the domain name:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you really believe the DMOZ link made the difference?<br />
Or is the same cause and effect issue like the guy with 9000 sitewide links? <img src='http://dixonjones.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Love the domain name:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dixon</title>
		<link>http://dixonjones.com/seo/number-1-for-search-engine-optimisation/comment-page-1/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>Dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 06:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dixonjones.com/?p=142#comment-277</guid>
		<description>Heh! :)
It wasn&#039;t 301&#039;d back then. There was real content and everything. Were you the DMoz editor that sent me down the path of whiteiousness then??? :)
Dixon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh! <img src='http://dixonjones.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
It wasn&#8217;t 301&#8242;d back then. There was real content and everything. Were you the DMoz editor that sent me down the path of whiteiousness then??? <img src='http://dixonjones.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Dixon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://dixonjones.com/seo/number-1-for-search-engine-optimisation/comment-page-1/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 10:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dixonjones.com/?p=142#comment-276</guid>
		<description>You dirty spammer you   :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You dirty spammer you   <img src='http://dixonjones.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

