Comments on: Proving a page passes PageRank and other secrets

By: admin

admin — Wed, 02 Feb 2011 08:09:52 +0000

I get results for both versions. The quotes are an operator you can use on Google and most search engines to ask for the exact phrase, as opposed to the words in any order.

By: The Big Bang Theory

The Big Bang Theory — Wed, 02 Feb 2011 05:28:05 +0000

Correction it says i posed it at 5:26 am. thats wrong its 12:26 am I’m not sure why it did that.

By: The Big Bang Theory

The Big Bang Theory — Wed, 02 Feb 2011 05:26:24 +0000

Just to point out it says their are no results for: “I live in Harlington with Marie and my two kids and I have just taken on an allotment” not I live in Harlington with Marie and my two kids and I have just taken on an allotment…. see the difference? the one you typed in had quotations around it. Google couldn’t find that statement in quotations because it doesn’t exist but could find it without quotation because that one does exist. Hence why after the search result it found it says “(without quotation). So no their is nothing wrong with Google’s algorithm. Google’s algorithm is a complex thing (as you know) more complex then most everyones mind can handle. Thats why when you use Google you don’t ever get viruses compared to Internet Explorer and Mozilla Firefox witch do.

By: admin

admin — Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:02:22 +0000

kinda – in that a link from an image is better than no link at all. However – whilst it increases the “juice” to your site overall, it spreads the focus of what your site is about. So imho no anchor text is possibly better than confusing anchor text.

By: Saving Money Tips

Saving Money Tips — Fri, 19 Nov 2010 14:03:39 +0000

If I pass pagerank to my site from totally meaningless anchor text, does this still improve the ranking of the keywords from my on-page factors?

By: Link Juice - Google Profiles dá força em seu domínio

Link Juice - Google Profiles dá força em seu domínio — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:30:53 +0000

[...] dixonjones.com Notícias [...]

By: Dixon Jones

Dixon Jones — Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:42:39 +0000

OK – new findings from the new test. So new post!

http://dixonjones.com/seo/google-profiles-pass-anchor-text-relevency/

By: Passing PageRank through Google Profiles » Dixon Jones:

Passing PageRank through Google Profiles » Dixon Jones: — Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:34:36 +0000

[...] have been testing whether a page passes PageRank over the last few months and in particular was using Google Profile for my test. I managed to [...]

By: Dixon Jones

Dixon Jones — Sun, 08 Feb 2009 19:45:32 +0000

OOH! Good point Hobo! Yes – if your test rings true, then there is indeed a flaw in my test. It also correlates with Chris Cemper’s comment.

It also lends itself to Jonny’s observations.

So I don’t know about 88 characters (or the cut off length) but I’ll have to do the test again now, feeding that thought in.

I have now updated the profile, with new anchor text to a new domain. You’ll be able to see what happens – but if you’ve done the test you’ll know. (I still want to see for myself).

By: Hobo

Hobo — Sun, 08 Feb 2009 17:39:48 +0000

The test could be flawed. You didn’t take into account a character limit on the actual hyperlink.

Your phrase is over 80 characters. A recent test I did seemed to confirm a 55 character limit (on that test alone).

http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/anchor-text-length/

Google Profiles do pass anchor text relevance. I did the same test. I will PM you if you want to see

Do They Pass Pagerank? Don’t know depends on other internal and external links to it I think.